News

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Chesapeake Bay Case

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Chesapeake Bay Case

Photo: WNAX


Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced they won’t hear the Chesapeake Bay Watershed case involving the EPA and the American Farm Bureau. The decision means the lower court ruling will stand which allows the EPA to continue requiring the seven states in the Chesapeake Bay to clamp down on nitrogen and phosphorous runoff into the watershed. Nebraska Farm Bureau National Affairs Coordinator Jordan Dux says his group is disappointed with the decision.

He says the EPA regulations in the Chesapeake Bay has precedent setting implications for both the Mississippi and Missouri River water basin areas.

Dux says it may take a new President and new philosophy at the EPA to improve how agriculture is treated going forward.

The farm groups including Farm Bureau had sued the EPA arguing the state’s rights issue needs to be resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Recent Headlines

3 days ago in Local

SOUTH DAKOTA FLU PREVENTION, STATE EPIDEMIOLOGIST OFFERS INSIGHT

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – With the colder weather and more time indoors, families are sharing their love…

3 days ago in Local

BILL RESTRICTS FOREIGN OWNERSHIP OF ELECTRIC FACILITIES IN SOUTH DAKOTA

PIERRE, S.D. (Michael Doorn / KELO News) – The House and Energy Committee passed two bills unanimously on Friday, one…

3 days ago in Local

STATE NEEDS TO SPEND $106 MILLION IN FEDERAL FUNDS BY END OF YEAR

PIERRE, S.D. (Makenzie Huber / South Dakota Searchlight) – South Dakota must spend $106 million in remaining pandemic relief by the…

5 days ago in Local

AS STUDENT VIOLENCE RISES, STATE WANTS DISTRICTS TO HAVE OPTIONS

PIERRE, S.D. (Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch) – Whether caused by the pervasiveness of social media, an increase…

5 days ago in Local

LAWMAKERS WORRY ABOUT FEASIBILITY, SUSTAINABILITY OF RURAL HEALTH TRANSFORMATION PLAN

PIERRE, S.D. (Makenzie Huber / South Dakota Searchlight) – South Dakota’s workforce shortage and federal limitations on a $189.5 million…